Latest Cover

Online Office

Contact Us

Issue:ISSN 1000-7083
          CN 51-1193/Q
Director:Sichuan Association for Science and Technology
Sponsored by:Sichuan Society of Zoologists; Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation; Sichuan Association of Wildlife Conservation; Sichuan University
Address:College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, No.29, Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610064, China
Tel:+86-28-85410485
Fax:+86-28-85410485
Email:scdwzz@vip.163.com & scdwzz001@163.com
Your Position :Home->Past Journals Catalog->2021 Vol.40 No.2

Spatio-Temporal Niche Differentiation of Sympatric Green Peafowl (Pavo muticus) and Silver Pheasant (Lophura nycthemera)
Author of the article:YAN Mingxiao1,2*, SUN Nan3, GU Bojian4, HE Ruchuan1,2, LIU Ying1,2
Author's Workplace:1. Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province 666303, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China;
3. School of Life Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
4. School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Key Words:Pavo muticus; Lophura nycthemera; sympatric distribution; niche differentiation; daily activity rhythm
Abstract:Niche differentiation is the basis of long-term stable coexistence of potentially competing species in sympatry. The study of niche differentiation between potential competitors in sympatry can be used to guide conservation practices. From June 2018 to May 2019, camera-traps were conducted for investigating the sympatric green peafowl (Pavo muticus) and silver pheasant (Lophura nycthemera) around the boundary of Xinping and E'shan County in Yuxi City, Yunnan Province. Wilcoxon test and kernel density estimation were used to analyze the utilization of altitude, vegetation and daily activity rhythm of the two species in dry and rainy seasons. The results showed that P. muticus and L. nycthemera were the dominant pheasants, with the highest RAI index (0.73 and 0.56, respectively) among 6 species of pheasants distributed in this area. P. muticus distributed more widely and significantly higher than that of L. nycthemera in elevation (1 486 m±75.2 m[JP2]vs. 1 390 m±71.9 m; w=8 122.5, P < 0.001). The 4 vegetation types were utilized relatively even by P. muticus, while L. nycthemera was found to prefer the evergreen broad-leaved forest (93.00% in dry season and 77.27% in rainy season). The daily activity rhythm of P. muticus was the normal mode with morning and dusk peaks. By contrast, L. nycthemera presented a single peak pattern, which is different from other studies, and significantly different from that of P. muticus. Their niche differentiation might be caused by the interspecific competition. It is suggested to protect this area for local pheasants, especially for P. muticus as the key species. More basic ecological research on wild P. muticus are needed in the future.
2021,40(2): 150-159 收稿日期:2020-11-02
分类号:Q959.7
作者简介:晏鸣霄(1994-),硕士研究生,研究方向:生态学,E-mail:yanmingxiao19@gmail.com
*通信作者:晏鸣霄,E-mail:yanmingxiao19@gmail.com
参考文献:
陈俊豪, 黄晓凤, 鲁长虎, 等. 2009. 白颈长尾雉与白鹇秋冬季空间生态位比较[J]. 生态学杂志, 28(12):2546-2552.
储诚进, 王酉石, 刘宇, 等. 2017. 物种共存理论研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 25(4):345-354.
高育仁, 余德群. 1995. 白鹇海南亚种的生态和现状[J]. 动物学研究, 16(4):353-358.
滑荣, 崔多英, 刘佳, 等. 2018. 中国绿孔雀种群现状调查[J]. 野生动物学报, 39(3):681-684.
蒋志刚, 江建平, 王跃招, 等. 2016. 中国脊椎动物红色名录[J]. 生物多样性, 24(5):500-551.
李晟, 王大军, 肖治术, 等. 2014. 红外相机技术在我国野生动物研究与保护中的应用与前景[J]. 生物多样性, 22(6):685-695.
李旭, 刘钊, 周伟, 等. 2016. 云南楚雄恐龙河保护区绿孔雀春季栖息地选择和空间分布[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 3:87-93.
刘佳, 李生强, 汪国海, 等. 2019. 喀斯特生境中白鹇的活动节律时间分配及集群行为[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 37(3):156-165.
刘鹏, 黄晓凤, 顾署生, 等. 2012. 江西官山自然保护区四种雉类的生境选择差异[J]. 动物学研究, 33(2):170-176.
刘钊, 周伟, 蒋志刚, 等. 2018. 云南元江上游石羊江河谷绿孔雀夜宿地选择[J]. 野生动物学报, 39(3):594-599.
刘钊, 周伟, 张仁功, 等. 2008. 云南元江上游石羊江河谷绿孔雀不同季节觅食地选择[J]. 生物多样性, 16(6):539-546.
卢汰春. 1991. 中国珍稀濒危野生鸡类[M]. 福州:福建科学技术出版社.
孙楠, 刘晨阳, Kongkasawat J, 等. 2020. 人造园林中斑文鸟和白腰文鸟的巢址选择[J]. 四川动物, 39(3):316-322.
王方, 叶思达, 汤永晶, 等. 2020. 云南哀牢山南段原鸡与白鹇活动节律及种间关系[J]. 野生动物学报, 41(3):641-647.
肖治术, 李欣海, 姜广顺. 2014. 红外相机技术在我国野生动物监测研究中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 22(6):683-684.
杨晓君, 文贤继, 杨岚, 等. 2000. 春季绿孔雀的栖息地及行为活动的初步观察[C]//第四届海峡两岸鸟类学术研讨会论文集. 昆明:海峡两岸鸟类学术研讨会.
余建平, 钱海源, 陈小南, 等. 2017. 基于红外相机技术的白鹇日活动节律研究[J]. 动物学杂志, 52(6):937-944.
约翰·马敬能, 卡伦·菲利普斯, 何芬奇. 2000. 中国鸟类野外手册[M]. 长沙:湖南教育出版社.
郑光美. 2015. 中国雉类[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社.
BirdLife International. 2016. Lophura nycthemera[DB/OL].[2020-08-30]. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22679220A92808107.
BirdLife International. 2018. Pavo muticus[DB/OL].[2020-08-30]. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.
Brickle NW. 2002. Habitat use, predicted distribution and conservation of green peafowl (Pavo muticus) in Dak Lak Province, Vietnam[J]. Biological Conservation, 105(2):189-197.
Hardin G. 1960. Competitive exclusion principle[J]. Science, 131(3409):1292-1297.
Harrington LA, Harrington AL, Yamaguchi N, et al. 2009. The impact of native competitors on an alien invasive:temporal niche shifts to avoid interspecific aggression?[J]. Ecology, 90(5):1207-1216.
IUCN. 2020. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2020-2[DB/OL].[2020-08-30]. https://www.iucnredlist.org.
Kong DJ, Wu F, Shan P, et al. 2018. Status and distribution changes of the endangered green peafowl (Pavo muticus) in China over the past three decades (1990s-2017)[J/OL]. Avian Research, 9:18[2020-07-01]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-018-0110-0.
Linnell JDC, Strand O. 2010. Interference interactions, co-existence and conservation of mammalian carnivores[J]. Diversity & Distributions, 6(4):169-176.
Liu YQ, Han LX, Xie YC, et al. 2009. The status and habitat use of green peafowl Pavo muticus in Shuangbai Konglonghe Nature Reserve, China[J]. International Journal of Galliformes Conservation, 1:32-35.
Madge S, McGowan PJK, Kirwan GM. 2002. Pheasants, partridges and grouse:a guide to the pheasants, partridges, quails, grouse, guineafowl, buttonquails and sandgrouse of the world[M]. UK:A&C Black.
Meredith M, Ridout M. 2014. Overlap:estimates of coefficient of overlapping for animal activity patterns[EB/OL]. (2020-05-09)[2020-06-01]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=overlap.
O'Brien TG. 2008. On the use of automated cameras to estimate species richness for large- and medium-sized rainforest mammals[J]. Animal Conservation, 11(3):179-181.
R Core Team. 2019. R:a language and environment for statistical computing[EB/OL]. (2019-04-26)[2020-06-01]. Vienna, Austria:R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
Rowcliffe M. 2016. ‘Package "activity":animal activity statistics’, R package version 1.1[EB/OL]. (2016-01-16)[2020-06-01]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=activity.
Saridnirun G, Meckvichai W, Dumrongrojwatthana P. 2017. Seasonal distribution and habitat use of the green peafowl Pavo muticus, Linnaeus 1766, in Wiang Lor Wildlife Sanctuary, Phayao Province, Northern Thailand[J]. Chiang Mai Journal of Science, 44(3):824-838.
Schoener TW. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities[J]. Science, 185(4145):27-39.
Sun N, Cao GH, Li GG, et al. 2020. Macaca leonina has a wider niche breadth than sympatric M. mulatta in a fragmented tropical forest in southwest China[J/OL]. American Journal of Primatology, 82(2):e23100[2020-09-01]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23100.
CopyRight©2021 Editorial Office of Sichuan Journal of Zoology 蜀ICP备08107403号-3