Latest Cover

Online Office

Contact Us

Issue:ISSN 1000-7083
          CN 51-1193/Q
Director:Sichuan Association for Science and Technology
Sponsored by:Sichuan Society of Zoologists; Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation; Sichuan Association of Wildlife Conservation; Sichuan University
Address:College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, No.29, Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610064, China
Tel:+86-28-85410485
Fax:+86-28-85410485
Email:scdwzz@vip.163.com & scdwzz001@163.com
Your Position :Home->Past Journals Catalog->2020 Vol.39 No.1

A Survey on the Population Densities of Three Galliformes Species by Using Two Different Methods in the Heizhugou National Nature Reserve, Sichuan
Author of the article:WEN Xue1, YAN Yong1, HE Meixiang1, RAN Jianghong1*, MA Xiaolong2, QIU Ruijun2, WANG Ni3
Author's Workplace:1. Key Laboratory of Bio-Resource and Eco-Environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China;
2. Administration of Heizhugou National Nature Reserve, Ebian, Sichuan Province 614300, China;
3. Yulin Desert Forest Park Management Center, Yulin, Shaanxi Province 719000, China
Key Words:Galliformes; population density; line transect method; point count method
Abstract:Population size is an important basic ecological character of species, and thus applying appropriate density survey method is fundamental to estimate the quantity. In this study, 2 commonly used methods (line transect and point count) were used to estimate the population densities of 3 Galliformes species of calling males (Chrysolophus amherstiae, Tragopan temminckii, and Ithaginis cruentus) in the Heizhugou National Nature Reserve (Sichuan province) between April and May in 2016. The results of line transect method and point count method showed that the population densities of the 3 species were 1.20 individuals/km2 and (6.31±0.98) individuals/km2, 5.41 individuals/km2 and (0.39±0.17) individuals/km2, and 3.01 individuals/km2 and (5.97±2.70) individuals/km2, respectively. This result suggested that except for T. temminckii, the densities of the other 2 species estimated by using point count method are better than by using line transect method. Therefore, it is recommended that different methods should be used for estimating the population densities of different pheasants, and large sample size can improve the accuracy of predictive results.
2020,39(1): 68-74 收稿日期:2019-01-21
分类号:Q959.7;Q958.1
作者简介:文雪(1993-),硕士研究生,研究方向:自然保护区、湿地、森林公园的建设与管理,E-mail:542943128@qq.com
*通信作者:冉江洪,E-mail:rjhong-01@163.com
参考文献:
蔡桂全. 1996. 青海省野牛沟地区主要兽类的数量与保护[J]. 兽类学报, 16(2):113-118.
蔡音亭, 干晓静, 马志军. 2010. 鸟类调查的样线法和样点法比较:以崇明东滩春季盐沼鸟类调查为例[J]. 生物多样性, 18(1):44-49.
陈道剑. 2019. 广东省森林鸟类的样线有效宽度与分布格局[D]. 广西:广西师范大学.
郭新亮, 杨灿朝, 李筑眉, 等. 2012. 贵州宽阔水自然保护区3种雉科鸟类的种群繁殖密度[J]. 海南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 25(3):304-306.
何明友, 张家藻, 刘绍龙, 等. 1996. 峨边黑竹沟地区自然植被初探[J]. 四川大学学报(自然科学版), 33(3):347-350.
李进发, 寸德平, 曹龙, 等. 2010. 苍山东坡雉类分布初步研究[J]. 大理大学学报, 9(10):53-55.
李仁贵, 戴波, 张秀雷, 等. 2007. 四川麻咪泽自然保护区雉类资源调查[J]. 四川动物, 26(3):569-571.
陆钢, 戴波, 李仁贵, 等. 2007. 四川老君山自然保护区的鸡形目种群密度研究[J]. 四川动物, 26(3):572-576.
Richard BH, Kenneth PB. 2002.关于使用样线法估计种群密度[J]. 动物学报, 48(6):812-818.
孙文婷, 赵思琪, 马莉丽, 等. 2012. Distance在样线法和样点法鸟类调查中的结果差异研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 40(27):13383-13384.
吴飞, 杨晓君. 2008. 样点法在森林鸟类调查中的运用[J]. 生态学杂志, 27(12):2240-2244.
徐基良, 张晓辉, 张正旺, 等. 2005. 白冠长尾雉雄鸟的冬季活动区与栖息地利用研究[J]. 生物多样性, 13(5):416-423.
许龙, 张正旺, 丁长青. 2003. 样线法在鸟类数量调查中的运用[J]. 生态学杂志, 22(5):127-130.
余建平, 陈小南, 任鹏, 等. 2017. 基于样线法和非损伤性标志重捕法对古田山小麂种群现状评价[J]. 兽类学报, 37(4):354-362.
张倩雯, 龚粤宁, 宋相金, 等. 2018. 红外相机技术与其他几种森林鸟类多样性调查方法的比较[J]. 生物多样性, 26(3):229-237.
张正旺, 丁长青, 丁平, 等. 2003. 中国鸡形目鸟类的现状与保护对策[J]. 生物多样性, 11(5):414-421.
赵灿军. 2016. 利用自动相机对大理苍山东坡白腹锦鸡种群的监测[J]. 绿色科技, (2):29-30.
郑光美. 2015. 中国雉类[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社.
郑光美. 2017. 中国鸟类分类与分布名录(第三版)[M]. 北京:科学出版社.
郑炜, 葛晨, 李忠秋, 等. 2012. 鸟类种群密度调查和估算方法初探[J]. 四川动物, 31(1):84-88.
Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, et al. 1993. Distance sampling:estimating abundance of biological populations[M]. London:Chapman and Hall.
Bibby CJ, Jones MJ, Marsden SJ. 1998. Bird surveys:expedition field techniques[M]. London:Expedition Advisory Centre, Royal Geographical Society.
Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Laake JL. 1980. Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations[J]. Wildlife Monographs, 72:3-202.
Duke G. 1989. Using call counts to compare western tragopan populations in Pakistan's Himalaya[J]. Pheasants in Asia, 1989:193-199.
Forbes SA. 1907. An ornithological cross-section of Illinois in autumn[J]. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin, 7(9):305-335.
Franco P, Fierro-Calderón K, Kattan G. 2006. Population densities and home range sizes of the chestnut wood-quail[J]. Journal of Field Ornithology, 77(1):85-90.
Ghose D, Kaul R, Saha GK. 2003. Status survey of the Blyth's tragopan in Blue Mountain National Park, Mizoram, India using call-count technique[J]. Current Science, 84(1):95-97.
Jolli V, Pandit MK. 2011. Monitoring pheasants (Phasianidae) in the western Himalayas to measure the impact of hydro-electric projects[J]. Ring, 33(1-2):37-46.
Kaul R, Shakya S. 2001. Spring call counts of some Galliformes in the Pipar Reserve, Nepal[J]. Forktail, 17:75-80.
Li S, Mcshea WJ, Wang D, et al. 2010. The use of infrared-triggered cameras for surveying phasianids in Sichuan province, China[J]. IBIS, 152(2):299-309.
Lu X, Cangjue ZM, Suolong CR, et al. 2003. Two field techniques for estimating relative abundance of Galliformes[J]. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 8(2):459-462.
Merikallio E. 1958. Finnish birds:their distribution and numbers[J]. Fauna Fennica, 5:1-181.
Nopp-Mayr U, Zohmann M. 2008. Spring densities and calling activities of rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta helvetica) in the Austrian Alps[J]. Journal of Ornithology, 149(1):135-139.
Wang N, Zhang ZW, Zheng GM, et al. 2004. Relative density and habitat use of four pheasant species in Xiao Shennongjia Mountains, Hubei province, China[J]. Bird Conservation International, 14:43-54.
CopyRight©2020 Editorial Office of Sichuan Journal of Zoology